COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FUNCTIONALIZATION AND CEMENTATION UNION TECHNIQUES FOR THE FRICTIONAL ..

Technical complications, such as gaps in the implantabutment (IA) connections and abutment retention, may occur when the implant and prosthesis (abutment) are linked. The aim of this research was to examine the IA frictional relation as well as its bond strength when enabled with and without cementation. Two classes of IA mounts were tested using images collected with a stereomicroscope in an in vitro laboratory experiment. Nine implants were split into two groups: Group I (GI), which received a conventionally activated attachment ball prosthesis, and Group II, which received a nonconventionally activated attachment ball prosthesis (GII),Prior to the activation of the abutment, dual resin cement was applied.ShapiroWilk test and F test were used for gap analysis and tensile strength testing, followed by t test. There was a disparity in the differences between the classes. Despite the fact that Group II's differences grew in size, its bond strength was higher than Group I's. Even with the increase in gaps, the cementation appears to have influenced the increase in bond strength in the implant-abutment attachment.

Please see the link - https://ikprress.org/index.php/AJRiB/article/view/5553